<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *****-gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and commentary on politics, technology, religion and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:13:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52677</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52677</guid>
		<description>You can search main articles using the search tool on the left panel. It doesn&#039;t search comments, though. I can, however, search them and the only time I mentioned Freddoso was here:

http://www.blogordie.com/2008/08/anti-books/comment-page-1/#comment-52322</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can search main articles using the search tool on the left panel. It doesn&#8217;t search comments, though. I can, however, search them and the only time I mentioned Freddoso was here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogordie.com/2008/08/anti-books/comment-page-1/#comment-52322" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogordie.com/2008/08/anti-books/comment-page-1/#comment-52322</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52671</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52671</guid>
		<description>Uggg... your better at looking up past posts than I.  I distinctly recall you dogging David Freddoso for a couple of specific reasons.  Hmmmm...now I gotta think where it might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uggg&#8230; your better at looking up past posts than I.  I distinctly recall you dogging David Freddoso for a couple of specific reasons.  Hmmmm&#8230;now I gotta think where it might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52664</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52664</guid>
		<description>Truth, if you read back, I believe you may find me critical about &lt;em&gt;Obama Nation&lt;/em&gt; or other misinformation floating around, but I really don&#039;t ever recall anyone but you saying anything about the contents of &lt;em&gt;The Case Against Barack Obama&lt;/em&gt;. It may be that that book is similar in content to stuff in &lt;em&gt;Obama Nation&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth, if you read back, I believe you may find me critical about <em>Obama Nation</em> or other misinformation floating around, but I really don&#8217;t ever recall anyone but you saying anything about the contents of <em>The Case Against Barack Obama</em>. It may be that that book is similar in content to stuff in <em>Obama Nation</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52660</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52660</guid>
		<description>WOW!!, Do I need to define why conservatives use those words?   I mean really, do I?   You don&#039;t think THAT is trashing do you? 

And that is right, you did NOT read the book, and you can&#039;t say &quot;ALL&quot; you know of the book you got from me, PLEASE!   Don&#039;t make me go search through your posts and find the comments you pulled from other liberal posts elsewhere of the misquotes in the book, or at least what they think is misquotes.  You passed judgment on that book from what other liberals said, not because of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!, Do I need to define why conservatives use those words?   I mean really, do I?   You don&#8217;t think THAT is trashing do you? </p>
<p>And that is right, you did NOT read the book, and you can&#8217;t say &#8220;ALL&#8221; you know of the book you got from me, PLEASE!   Don&#8217;t make me go search through your posts and find the comments you pulled from other liberal posts elsewhere of the misquotes in the book, or at least what they think is misquotes.  You passed judgment on that book from what other liberals said, not because of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52657</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52657</guid>
		<description>Truth, actually all I know about &lt;em&gt;The Case Against Barack Obama&lt;/em&gt; I got from you. And by the way, phrases like &quot;savior&quot; and &quot;messiah&quot; come exclusively from the right when making derisive remarks about Obama supporters. We don&#039;t use these words and don&#039;t think that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth, actually all I know about <em>The Case Against Barack Obama</em> I got from you. And by the way, phrases like &#8220;savior&#8221; and &#8220;messiah&#8221; come exclusively from the right when making derisive remarks about Obama supporters. We don&#8217;t use these words and don&#8217;t think that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52654</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52654</guid>
		<description>HE DID NOT TRASH HIM.    &quot;YOU&quot; Misunderstood what &quot;I&quot; said, or it just doesn&#039;t soak in.

  Did YOU READ the Book?   NO!   You read what some Libs said about it. 2nd Hand information.

Because it is not Positive Information about Obama doesn&#039;t me he is Trashing him. The man collected data and published a book on his findings.  SORRY it doesn&#039;t conform with your view of the world.   Obama isn&#039;t really the Savior, that is just a nickname, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HE DID NOT TRASH HIM.    &#8220;YOU&#8221; Misunderstood what &#8220;I&#8221; said, or it just doesn&#8217;t soak in.</p>
<p>  Did YOU READ the Book?   NO!   You read what some Libs said about it. 2nd Hand information.</p>
<p>Because it is not Positive Information about Obama doesn&#8217;t me he is Trashing him. The man collected data and published a book on his findings.  SORRY it doesn&#8217;t conform with your view of the world.   Obama isn&#8217;t really the Savior, that is just a nickname, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52643</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52643</guid>
		<description>Truth, you misunderstood what I said: 

You said: &quot;WHO said something to “TRASH” him [Obama]?&quot;

I said: &quot;I find it hard to understand that comment from someone who has read “The Case Against Barack Obama”.&quot;

Meaning that someone like you who had read &quot;The Case Against Barack Obama&quot; would have first hand knowledge of a specific example of someone who had trashed Obama, the author of that book.

Measure twice, cut once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth, you misunderstood what I said: </p>
<p>You said: &#8220;WHO said something to “TRASH” him [Obama]?&#8221;</p>
<p>I said: &#8220;I find it hard to understand that comment from someone who has read “The Case Against Barack Obama”.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meaning that someone like you who had read &#8220;The Case Against Barack Obama&#8221; would have first hand knowledge of a specific example of someone who had trashed Obama, the author of that book.</p>
<p>Measure twice, cut once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52640</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52640</guid>
		<description>Reading &quot;The Case Against Barack Obama&quot; is considered trashing in your viewpoint?   There are many forms of information in the world, and it may be a surprise to you but BLOGGING isn&#039;t the only means I did information research.   I looked in many places, including yes READING.      For a man to put into print information, which to the best of my knowledge is information he found in other documents, records and/or newspapers, I take that for what it is, neither true or false but INFORMATION.      Nowhere in the Book were words written calling him bad names or similar demeaning adjectives that would be defined as TRASHING.  

I guess it depends what your Definition of &quot;IS&quot; is..... or your definition of TRASH is......  Slick Willy.

To say something about a Conservative is to Judge him, say the same thing about a Liberal is to Trash him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading &#8220;The Case Against Barack Obama&#8221; is considered trashing in your viewpoint?   There are many forms of information in the world, and it may be a surprise to you but BLOGGING isn&#8217;t the only means I did information research.   I looked in many places, including yes READING.      For a man to put into print information, which to the best of my knowledge is information he found in other documents, records and/or newspapers, I take that for what it is, neither true or false but INFORMATION.      Nowhere in the Book were words written calling him bad names or similar demeaning adjectives that would be defined as TRASHING.  </p>
<p>I guess it depends what your Definition of &#8220;IS&#8221; is&#8230;.. or your definition of TRASH is&#8230;&#8230;  Slick Willy.</p>
<p>To say something about a Conservative is to Judge him, say the same thing about a Liberal is to Trash him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52602</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52602</guid>
		<description>While Bill Clinton did lie about some things, he was also investigated for things he didn&#039;t do and in particular hounded about things that were unrelated to his execution of the office of President. I don&#039;t defend Clinton for what he DID do wrong, but the story is more complicated. 

In the case of George Bush, I personally find enough undisputed actions in his official job performance to provide all the justification necessary for criticizing him. One doesn&#039;t need to speculate to know that his administration started a war in Iraq based on bad intelligence, which at best is negligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Bill Clinton did lie about some things, he was also investigated for things he didn&#8217;t do and in particular hounded about things that were unrelated to his execution of the office of President. I don&#8217;t defend Clinton for what he DID do wrong, but the story is more complicated. </p>
<p>In the case of George Bush, I personally find enough undisputed actions in his official job performance to provide all the justification necessary for criticizing him. One doesn&#8217;t need to speculate to know that his administration started a war in Iraq based on bad intelligence, which at best is negligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogordie.com/2008/12/gate/comment-page-1/#comment-52592</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogordie.com/?p=527#comment-52592</guid>
		<description>Truth said: &quot;Stop crying about “trashing” the President. WHO said something to “TRASH” him? &quot;

I find it hard to understand that comment from someone who has read &quot;The Case Against Barack Obama&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth said: &#8220;Stop crying about “trashing” the President. WHO said something to “TRASH” him? &#8221;</p>
<p>I find it hard to understand that comment from someone who has read &#8220;The Case Against Barack Obama&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

