Burden of Proof

I got a copy of a letter today that said, in part,

Even if he is sworn in on January 20, Barack Obama will not legally be President of the United States, unless he can prove that he is a “natural born citizen”.

The fact of the matter is, Barack Obama has presented evidence that he was born in Hawaii, an official certification of the facts of his birth from his home state, a certification which BY LAW is prima facie evidence of those facts. Therefore, it is the responsibility of anyone who thinks otherwise to prove their claims.

If the birth certificate is a forgery, then prove it. If Obama was born in Kenya, prove it. If Hawaiian law allows false statements on birth certificates, prove it.  If dual citizenship at birth negates “natural born” status, prove it. If Obama lost his citizenship in Indonesia, prove it. The list is long and I needn’t belabor the point further. If there any challenges to his citizenship prove them.

People have a right to file lawsuits. That is how proof is determined in the public arena. Proof cannot, however, be assessed over the Internet. Internet trials are just the trading of a mixture of information and misinformation, with no rules of evidence, and no referee.

To those who think Barack Obama is not qualified to be president, you are entitled to your opinion, but the United States is a place where we do things by the rule of law. If you want to exclude Barack Obama from being president, I suggest you hire a very good lawyer or write your congressman. Our Constitution doesn’t provide for “trial by blog”.

Posted in Educational Reports, Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 10 Comments

Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!

I have been privately wondering exactly why the smearbots have been clamoring for a copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate. Any reasonable person expects that it will be 100% consistent with the birth certificate we have all grown to know and love. The obvious logic says that once this document comes out, their case falls apart, so why destroy themselves?

The answer popped into my mailbox this morning, and it is highly instructive on how the smear campaign works. The answer comes from another document, Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration. Some unnamed “former federal agent” through a Freedom of Information Act request obtained the form where Barack Obama, fulfilling his legal obligation, registered for the draft. Wow, somebody got the document and the document says what is supposed to say! But…

The forensic flyspeck examiners are all over this thing, claiming irregular postal stamps, funny signatures, date errors, document filing number inconsistencies, and who knows what else. You can see the whole thing on Debbie Schlussel’s site.

The point here is that hardly any of us knows squat about selective service law, postal regulations or federal document locator numbers. (Just like most folks won’t know how to read the Hawaii long form birth record when it comes out.) All sorts of “claims of irregularities” are made about the selective service document by anonymous persons (but anonymous persons with anonymously claimed expertise), including (you guessed it) a federal conspiracy. Ignorance is the playground of the smearbots: whether ignorance of document use, international law, constitutional law, immigration law, vital records policy, postal regulations, selective service law, federal document handling procedures or Hawaiian law, the smearbots can say almost anything and only the hardiest Fact Checkers could begin to hope to track it all down.

But I say, when you’ve caught the smearbots a dozen times in their lies, does it make sense to even listen to them any more. In the fable, the little boy only got to cry “wolf” two times.

Posted in Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 1 Comment

OCD Crowd’s Next Gambit

The forensic document experts were exposed as impostors and incompetents. The Hawaiian foreign birth registration law, Hawaiian Homelands Act, and rules about altered birth certificates not being so marked have all been shown bogus. Attempts to redefine “natural born citizen” prove unconvincing to people who stayed awake in high school civics class. Grandmother transcripts are actually read. Naturalization law misrepresentations are exposed.

As the truth starts to sink in from the labors of the fact checkers exposing lie after lie, painstakingly debunking the anti-Obama smears, and as reasonable people come to the realization that the existing Obama Birth Certificate is legit (attested to by Hawaiian officials) and it plainly shows Obama was born in Honolulu, the next plan of attack is being prepared…

Obama’s mother likely brought Barack back from Kenya, claimed he was “born at home” and scammed US citizenship for him.

Source AlterMedia.info (altermedia.info is a white supremacist web site “news for people of European descent”.)

Exactly how she could have done that in the mere 4 days separating his birth and his birth registration, I cannot guess (probably they will claim that Obama is actually older than his certificate says). (Ignoring the fact that there’s no record of any trip to Kenya in the first place.)

This scenario creates a hypothetical scam that evades the plain statements on Obama’s certified document from Hawaii. This will keep the uproar going for that “long form” (which would show if he were born at home or in hospital). Of course when the long form comes out it will give more data points to be spun, misinterpreted, lied about and declared a fraud.

Anything to keep the stink going.

Posted in Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 7 Comments

OCD Links

As much as for my use as yours, I’m maintaining a list of web links useful for the Obama Citizenship Denial controversy.

Certificate Denial Refutation

Citizenship law and process debunking

Other Debunking links:

Obama Citizenship Denial proponents

Lawsuits

Posted in Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 2 Comments

ERROR! ERROR!

I had written on these pages (which I will correct as soon as I finish this) that the State of Hawaii had a law that allows Hawaiian residents to register infants born out of state. I cited the law, which I found on a State web site:

[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]

I thought I was TOUGH STUFF for finding this, that is, until someone pointed out that little “L 1982” indicating that the law wasn’t passed until 1982, a couple of decades after Obama was born.

I’m so embarrassed!

Posted in Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 17 Comments

The “Smoking Grandmother”

There are three recordings relating to Barack Obama’s birth on the Internet. Two regard his paternal grandmother in Kenya and one involves the Kenyan Ambassador to the United States.

The first grandmother tape is on YouTube. Before you visit the Obama Grandmother audio recording, let me offer a suggestion. Close your eyes and listen to it without watching the titles added to guide your thinking. You probably won’t get much out of it. The recording is of a transatlantic telephone call of the poorest quality. From accounts I have read, the actual call dropped multiple times and what you just heard was edited together from multiple calls. The point here is that neither you nor I, nor the participants of the call would have had an easy time following this strained conversation. What Obama’s grandmother actually says in the call is inaudible, and what we hear (barely) is someone else on her end translating both ways. The recording was made in the US and that end of the conversation is crystal clear.

Here’s an excerpt of the transcript of the translation copied from the YouTube video titles:

McRae: Mrs. Obama, you can rest assured that I am praying for your son, for your grandson.
Translator: Yes, it is also helpful towards it is beginning to help.
McRae: Okay.
Sarah Obama: (unintelligible)
Translator: She says she is cover your prayers for her (unintelligible) for her son.
McRae: Okay. And tell her that I will be coming there in December and that I would like to come by and pray with her.
Translator: Yes. Ye atakuwa mweze Desemba.
Kweli Shuhubla: In December. He will come in December and he wants to come and talk with you.
Sarah Obama: (unintelligible)
Translator: Oh, she says you’re so encourage her. Your coming in December, so you can talk with her.
McRae: Amen. I am so thankful. Could I ask her, uh, about his, uh his actual birthplace? I would like to see his actual birthplace when I, when I come to Kenya in December. Uh, was she present when he was, was she present when he was born in Kenya.
Translator: Ailuma zalima Obama (unintelligible)
Kweli Shuhubia: He is asking her, he wants to know something was ah she present when he was born?
Translator: Yes. She says “Yes she was!” She was present when Obama was born:

What can one make of this tape? The first obvious fact is that the communications were difficult and that the parties were having a hard time understanding each other. After sleeping on it, though, the essential problem jumped out. Look back at the transcript, at the question: “was ah she present when he was born?” Who is “he”? The last person mentioned was by Sarah Obama “(unintelligible) for her son”. Read it carefully. She is saying that she was present at the birth of her son, our president elect’s father! (Actually Barack Obama, Sr. is Sarah’s step son, not her biological son.)

Ron McRae, outspoken anti-abortion advocate, identifies himself as the “bishop of the Anabaptists Churches of North America”. The transcript above is same as the sworn affidavit by him in Berg v. Obama. Given the penalties for making a sworn false statement, I will give McRae the benefit of the doubt. However in the end the tape simply does not say that Barack Obama II was born in Kenya, but in fact the tape says a lot more as we will see in a moment.

The audio tape sounds to me like it was designed to trap Sarah Obama into saying that her grandson was born in Kenya. The rest was padding; the only thing of substance was this birth question. Whether the interviewer intentionally interjected the confusion when he said: ” am praying for your son, for your grandson” or did said it by accident, he misled Sarah. The rest of the “i was with him in the delivery room in Mombasa” stuff you see on the Internet is not in the transcript at all. (Third hand accounts of the tape have grown in the telling.)

A reader and listener with critical thinking could have listened to the Grandmother tape or read the transcript and seen that the tape doesn’t way what it is represented to say. I congratulate someone who got that far. But that is not how far it goes. The YouTube tape and the Berg v. Obama affidavit ends premature; the audio recording itself has much more on it, and here is the real “smoking gun”. The full tape contains a clarification where Sarah Obama makes it clear that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, in America. The full version is available here, and the clarification starts around 5 minutes into the tape. At some point, the tape was edited to remove the clear statement from Sarah Obama that her grandson was born in Hawaii.

In a professionally done video of Sarah Obama here where she clearly says that she got to meet her grandson when he came to visit Kenya as an adult. (For some reason the poster of this tape has requested that it not be embedded in web sites, so you will have to link to YouTube to view it.)

Now compare the first audio recording to the recording of another phone conversation, this time with the Kenyan Ambassador to the US. Once again, the call is an obvious trap designed to get the person on the other end to say that Obama was born in Kenya. Whether the Ambassador meant Barack Obama (the father) or whether he meant the birth lineage of Barack Obama the son is not clear. But it is unlikely that the Ambassador is saying that Barack Obama II was born in Kenya (how would he know?). Indeed, in a follow-up statement, the ambassador says he doesn’t know where Obama was born according to the radio station that made the original call, WRIF.

Posted in Educational Reports, Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 10 Comments

OCD and Math Education

I think the persistence of Obama Citizenship Denial (OCD) may be related to the poor state of mathematics education in this country. I do not refer to higher mathematics, or arithmetic, but to the more basic skill of counting.

Let me offer this example:

There is a page on the AtlasShruggs.com web site where a “forensic document expert” declares the published Obama birth certificate a fraud. The most accessible part of his evidence is close-up shots of the security borders of sample copies issued about the same time and Obama’s. The borders are different, therefore the Obama certificate is bogus.

There is a page on another website where Dr. Rod Polarik examines a Hawaiian birth certificate issued within three months of Obama’s. Here the security borders are identical. Polarik concludes that Obama’s certificate is bogus because if the borders are the same, then the security seal should also be the same (but it isn’t, according to him).

Now, count the number of document experts who conclude Obama’s birth certificate is bogus. In the OCD world, the answer is 2. But, but since they cannot both be true (the borders cannot be both correct and not correct), one excludes the other, only one can be counted, perhaps.

Both of those web sited claim incontrovertible proof. They contradict each other. I’d say they cancel each other out, and the real count is zero.

Both of these web sites have been debunked. Please refer to: https://www.blogordie.com/2008/11/dr-rod-polariks-analysis-of-barack-obamas-birth-certificate/

Posted in Obama Citizenship Denial, Politics | 22 Comments